The Brualdi Law Firm Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Sunrise Senior Living -- SRZ


NEW YORK, Jan. 16, 2007 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- The Brualdi Law Firm announces that a lawsuit seeking class action status has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of Sunrise Senior Living ("Sunrise" or the "Company") (NYSE:SRZ) between August 4, 2005 and June 15, 2006, (the "Class Period").

No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Sunrise common stock during the period described above, you have certain rights, and have until no later than 60 days from January 16, 2007, in which to move for Lead Plaintiff status. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Tali Leger, Director of Shareholder Relations at The Brualdi Law Firm, 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York 10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1877 or (212) 952-0602, by email to tleger@brualdilawfirm.com or visit our website at http://www.brualdilawfirm.com/

The complaint charges Sunrise and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Sunrise provides residential and other services to retirees and elderly persons through facilities it develops and constructs and then manages, often through joint ventures.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, its stock option plans, its compensation practices and its financial results. As a result of these false statements, Sunrise's common stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $39.68 per share on March 29, 2006. The individual defendants took advantage of Sunrise's falsified financial results, the artificial inflation of Sunrise's stock and the manipulation of its stock option plans by selling shares of their Sunrise stock for illegal insider trading proceeds of over $34 million, while Sunrise's top officers pocketed millions more in unjustified bonus payments enhanced in part by Sunrise's falsified profits. The complaint alleges that defendants had previously manipulated the Company's stock option plans so as to enrich themselves by "backdating" or "spring-loading" the stock options they were granted.

Then on May 9, 2006, Sunrise disclosed a delay in reporting its first quarter 2006 results to allow a review of its financial statements, and on July 31, 2006, Sunrise revealed it would be forced to restate its financial statements going back several years -- at least to 1999 -- and that its prior financial statements could no longer be relied upon. Sunrise also admitted it could not file current period financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2006 and that when it restated its financial results, at least $100 million of previously reported profits from its joint ventures and real estate sales would be eliminated. As these revelations unfolded, Sunrise's stock fell from $39.62 on May 8, 2006 to as low as $24.40 on July 31, 2006.

More information on this and other class actions can be found on the Class Action Newsline at www.primenewswire.com/ca



            

Contact Data