NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2008 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. announces that a lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on behalf of purchasers of Oshkosh Corporation ("Oshkosh" or "the Company") (NYSE:OSK) common stock during the period between November 1, 2007 and June 25, 2008 (the "Class Period") for violations of federal securities laws.
No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Oshkosh common stock during the Class Period, and wish to move the court for appointment of lead plaintiff, you must do so by November 18, 2008. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in the Company during the Class Period. You do not need to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff in order to share in any recovery.
To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Sue Lee at The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York 10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1187 or (212) 952-0602, by email to slee@brualdilawfirm.com or visit our website at http://www.brualdilawfirm.com.
The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants materially misled the investing public, thereby inflating the price of Oshkosh's common stock, by publicly issuing materially false and misleading statements and omitting to disclose material facts necessary to make defendants' statements not false and misleading. As alleged in the complaint, these statements and omissions were materially false and misleading in that they failed to disclose the following adverse facts which were known to defendants, or recklessly disregarded by them: (a) that synergies related to Oshkosh's European facility rationalization program for its refuse business, the Geesink Norba Group, were lower and the cost of such rationalization was higher than represented; (b) that the value of Oshkosh's European refuse business was impaired and overstated and should have been written down; (c) that Oshkosh's JLG access-equipment division was experiencing a dramatic decrease in demand; and (d) that, as a result of the foregoing, Oshkosh lacked any reasonable basis to maintain its financial guidance for fiscal 2008.
More information on this and other class actions can be found on the Class Action Newsline at www.globenewswire.com/ca.