Dublin, Sept. 09, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Negotiation Skills for Contracts and Commercial Managers Training Course" training has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
This highly interactive course emphasises why it is so important to engage in the battle of the forms and achieve agreement between the contracting parties. It explains how a well-negotiated contract can add value and minimise exposure to potential risks and later disputes/litigation. It also covers how a well-negotiated contract can add value and strengthen a long-term relationship, developing collaboration to realise opportunities and make the management of projects easier, with fewer risks and less delays.
This course will give delegates the methodology to prepare for negotiation in a thorough, comprehensive and structured manner, and enable them to have clarity in what they aim to achieve from the negotiation and identify the best approach.
This course combines theory with practical application, giving delegates structure to how they approach a contract negotiation so that they are fully informed, which in turn instills confidence ready to achieve results.
This course will look at the content of the negotiation and the process of the negotiation, without the use of legal jargon.
Benefits of attending
By attending this course you will develop your skills to:
- Plan the best way to prepare for a negotiation
- Understand how to add value and minimise exposure to risks
- Get to grips with the best techniques to achieve positive outcomes
- Learn how to build and sustain relationships with key stakeholders
- Use best practice techniques to undertake the negotiation
- Evaluate outcomes and reach formal written agreement
Who Should Attend:
- Contracts and commercial managers and engineers
- Business development managers
- Project and procurement managers
- All those involved in the negotiation and management of commercial business contracts
Certifications:
- CPD: 6 hours for your records
- Certificate of completion
Key Topics Covered:
Introduction
Ensuring the outcome of the negotiation is legally binding
- Legal protection
- Exercise - Co-op v ILC (International Computers Limited now part of Fujitsu)
- Creating a legally binding contract - LILAC
- Legality (including Bribery Act, Competition Act, Unfair Contract Terms Act, Misrepresentation/Duress)
- Intent
- Legal capacity v Power of attorney
- Agreement (Offer & Acceptance, battle of the forms. Invitation to treat v offer. Letter of Intent. Authority to proceed)
- Consideration, legal value (FOC offerings/project reviews and amendments to scope)
- What, and why, are we negotiating
- Understanding the relationship between implied term and express terms in Contract law
- Shape and form of a contract
- Implied terms (statute, Acts of Parliament)
- Express terms (negotiated terms agreed verbally, in writing or by conduct)
- Understanding the starting position in statute (Implied terms) and how, and why, Express terms amend or deviate from the Implied terms. Focus of the 'why' being:
- Clarity - removing 'one size fits all' subjective, ambiguous elements of implied terms, i.e. acceptance criteria revised from 'satisfactory quality' to quantitative measurements, e.g. KPI's /service levels etc
- Implications of the 'Reasonable' rule in English contract law
- Meaning of 'best endeavours' and 'reasonable endeavours'
- Importance of using the 'Definitions' section in the contract
- Proactive risk management - allocating ownership of contractual promises and liability if contract is breached/contractual promise broken.
- Placing risk with party best able to manage it
- Monetary compensation v practical solutions/remedies e.g. 'solutions not problems',
- Plan Bs/contingency plans to move the project forward. Avoid litigation
- Take advantage of stronger bargaining position to reduce own liability/risk exposure
- Transparency to enable effective Supply Chain Management (SCM)
- Relationship management: 'win-win' for long term gains. Realising opportunities
- Exercise - Review of sample Express term clauses
Preparing for the negotiation
- Negotiation is two fold: content and process. Step 1: content
- Greenhalgh Negotiation model - Preparation, Relationship, Information gathering, Information using, Closing, Implementing the Agreement
- Understanding your strategy - objectives/goals
- Establishing the drivers influencing you:
- Company policy/mission
- Relationship (with other party) or Task (achieving the best outcome for you)
- Win/Win v Win/Lose. Carter's pie theory: increasing pie size or getting largest slice.
- Time v Quality v Price (Slack, Chambers & Johnson's Iron Triangle)
- Attitude to risk: risk minimisation or sharing risk. Risk Management Strategies: 4T's (Tolerate; Transfer; Terminate; Treat)
- Methodology for determining priorities: MIL, Must have; Intent to have; Like to have
- Methodology for cost v benefit analysis of amount of time and effort give to negotiation reflecting the criticality of the outcome: Kraljic matrix - leverage; strategic; non-critical; bottleneck
- Exercise - Price v Scope or Risk
- Exercise - Preparing your MIL
- Exercise - Drafting potential settlement zones. 4T's
Determining your bargaining position
- Different theories/methodologies, same logic:
- Determining the bargaining power of each of the negotiating parties.
- Difference sources of power: Reward; Coercive; Expert; Informational; Referent; Legitimate
- "BRA": Best Realistic Alternative/"BATNA": Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
- Porter's 5 Force: Bargaining power of suppliers; of buyers; threat of new entrants; threat of substitutes; industry rivalry
- Porter's Generic Strategies for Competitive Advantage model: cost leadership; cost focus; differentiation; differentiation focus.
- Steel & Court's Supplier Preferencing model - Development; Core Business; Nuisance; Exploitable. Attractiveness of buyer's organisation and value of buyer's business to the supplier
- SWOT analysis: Strengths; Weaknesses; Opportunities; Threats
- Cox's Power and Dependency matrix
- Exercise - Porter's Generic Strategies
- Determining the bargaining power of each of the negotiating parties.
Undertaking the negotiation
- Negotiation is two-fold: content and process. Step 2: process
- Greenhalgh Negotiation model - Preparation, Relationship, Information gathering, Information using, Closing, Implementing the Agreement
- Aligning your negotiation style and tactics to your bargaining position and strategy
Negotiation style
- Exercise - negotiation questionnaire identifying delegates default style
- Different theories, same message:
- 6 styles theory: Acceptance, Compromise, Threat, Emotion, Bargain, Logic.
- Cooperative (bargaining & logic) v Competitive (threats).
- 3 C's: Compromise, Compete, Collaborate
- 3 types - Assertive (aggressive), Accommodator (relationship oriented), Analyst (conflict avoidant)
- Thomas-Kilmann dual concern model: Competing, Accommodating, Avoiding, Compromising or Collaborate.
- Constructive v Destructive
- Push (exerting power)/Pull (persuasion) influences during a negotiation
- Rational compromise
- Consciously selecting an appropriate style to achieve objectives
- Exercise - 'Push'/'Pull' and 'Constructive'/'Destructive' approaches
Negotiation tactics
- Confidence v arrogance
- Honest and trust, more than just rapport. Relationship values and drivers. Avoiding getting trapped in the 'vicious circle of blame'
- Acknowledgement of past interactions - good or bad
- 'Framing' the negotiations
- Opening the negotiation/effective listening & asking questions, gaining insight
- Exchange of information/being aware of your own disclosures
- Getting a reply: 'rephrasing/reframing' the same question
- Use of empathy for 'win-win' and/or to encourage disclosure of information
- Ury & Fisher's - 'Getting to Yes': separating people from the problem; focusing on interest rather than position (Not what but why, reasons behind stance); generating options; focus on objectives
- Body language
- Silence tactic - using it/diffusing it
- Breaking deadlock and moving negotiations forward
- Exercise - Effective questioning
Approach and environment to reflect objectives and maximise desired outcome
- Timing
- Mode/venue
- Environment
- Atmosphere
- Attendees
Structuring negotiations and good 'housekeeping'
- Establishing power of attorney of attendees
- Ensuring confidentiality
- Keeping negotiation open until formal written agreement signed
- Focus - use of agenda: pros and cons
- Summarising and capturing the agreement accurately
Final questions
Speakers:
Catherine Hurst
Consultant & Trainer
Falconbury Ltd
Catherine Hurst is an independent commercial consultant and trainer. She was formerly a Commercial Manager at BAe Systems, following previous contract and commercial roles with GEC and Siemens, and has extensive practical experience of contract management, contract negotiation, commercial risk management and bid management.
She has been providing public training courses and in-house training courses for more than 10 years. Her success is demonstrated by the long standing relationship she has developed with numerous clients, to whom she provides regular repeats of her in-house courses.
Her training clients cross all sectors, including commercial companies, the government sector and charities. She is a highly experienced and a very popular trainer. Her style and manner of training brings the subject matter to life, making it enjoyable and easy to understand for all.
For more information about this training visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/4r03oy
About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.