BALA CYNWYD, Pa., Nov. 21, 2001 (PRIMEZONE) -- Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP announced today that it recently filed lawsuits on behalf of shareholders of Transmeta Corporation, Vixel Corporation, Airgate PCS, Inc. and Evolve Software, Inc. for violations of the federal securities laws.
If you purchased the securities of any of the companies listed below during the respective class periods, you may be a member of the class and have until the date specified to move the court to become the lead plaintiff. For more information on a particular lawsuit and to view the complaint, you may visit our Website at www.sbclasslaw.com. To learn more about your rights and interests in these cases and your ability to potentially recoup your losses, please contact Schiffrin & Barroway directly at 888-299-7706 (toll free) or 610-822-2221, fax number 610-822-0002 or by e-mail at info@sbclasslaw.com.
TRANSMETA CORPORATION (Nasdaq:TMTA) (Class Period: 11/06/00 - 12/06/00). The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On or about November 6, 2000, Transmeta commenced an initial public offering of 13,000,000 of its shares of common stock at an offering price of $21 per share (the "Transmeta IPO"). In connection therewith, Transmeta filed a registration statement, which incorporated a prospectus (the "Prospectus"), with the SEC. The complaint further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the Underwriters had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the Underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of Transmeta shares issued in connection with the Transmeta IPO; and (ii) the Underwriters had entered into agreements with customers whereby the Underwriters agreed to allocate Transmeta shares to those customers in the Transmeta IPO in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional Transmeta shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The lead plaintiff motion must be filed no later than January 15, 2002.
VIXEL CORPORATION (Nasdaq:VIXL) (Class Period: 10/01/99 - 12/06/00). The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On or about October 1, 1999, Vixel commenced an initial public offering of 4,300,000 of its shares of common stock at an offering price of $18 per share (the "Vixel IPO"). In connection therewith, Vixel filed a registration statement, which incorporated a prospectus (the "Prospectus"), with the SEC. The complaint further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the Underwriters had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the Underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of Vixel shares issued in connection with the Vixel IPO; and (ii) the Underwriters had entered into agreements with customers whereby the Underwriters agreed to allocate Vixel shares to those customers in the Vixel IPO in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional Vixel shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The lead plaintiff motion must be filed no later than January 15, 2002.
AIRGATE PCS, INC. (Nasdaq:PCSA) (Class Period: 09/27/99 - 12/06/00). The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On or about September 27, 1999, Airgate commenced an initial public offering of 6,700,000 of its shares of common stock at an offering price of $17 per share (the "Airgate IPO"). In connection therewith, Airgate filed a registration statement, which incorporated a prospectus (the "Prospectus"), with the SEC. The complaint further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) Defendants had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which Defendants allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of Airgate shares issued in connection with the Airgate IPO; and (ii) Defendants had entered into agreements with customers whereby Defendants agreed to allocate Airgate shares to those customers in the Airgate IPO in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional Airgate shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. The lead plaintiff motion must be filed no later than January 6, 2002.
EVOLVE SOFTWARE, INC. (Nasdaq:EVLV) (Class Period: 08/09/00 - 12/06/00). The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On or about August 9, 2000, Evolve commenced an initial public offering of 5,000,000 of its shares of common stock at an offering price of $9 per share (the "Evolve IPO"). In connection therewith, Evolve filed a registration statement, which incorporated a prospectus (the "Prospectus"), with the SEC. The complaint further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the Underwriters had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the Underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of Evolve shares issued in connection with the Evolve IPO; and (ii) the Underwriters had entered into agreements with customers whereby the Underwriters agreed to allocate Evolve shares to those customers in the Evolve IPO in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional Evolve shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. The lead plaintiff motion must be filed no later than January 6, 2002.
Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP has prosecuted shareholder class actions for over fourteen years and has recovered more than $1 billion for investors. If you are a shareholder in any of the companies listed above and would like to be a lead plaintiff in one of these securities class actions, please contact Schiffrin & Barroway at 888-299-7706.
More information on these and other class actions can be found at www.primezone.com/ca.