-- 257 polyps (including 136 adenomas) were identified with the
colonoscope alone. The Third Eye allowed detection of 34 additional
polyps -- including 15 additional pre-cancerous adenomas that were
hidden from the view of the colonoscope because they were located
behind folds.
-- For lesions 6 mm or larger, the mean additional detection rates with
the Third Eye Retroscope were 18.2% for all polyps and 25.0% for
adenomas.
-- For lesions 10 mm or larger, the additional detection rates with the
Third Eye were 30.8% for all polyps and 33.3% for adenomas.
-- In 28 individuals (11.2%), at least 1 additional polyp was found with
the Third Eye.
The objective of the 298-patient, 9-center study led by Dr. DeMarco was to
evaluate whether experience with the Third Eye Retroscope affects polyp
detection rates and procedure times in physicians who were experienced
colonoscopists but who had not previously used the Third Eye except during
training with a plastic model of the colon. The study findings included:
-- Overall, 182 polyps were seen with the colonoscope and 27 additional
polyps were detected with the Third Eye Retroscope, a 14.8% increase.
-- Overall, 100 adenomas were detected with the colonoscope and 16 more
with the Third Eye Retroscope, a 16.0% increase.
-- For procedures performed after each physician had completed 15
procedures, the mean additional detection rates with the TER were 17.0%
for all polyps and 25.0% for adenomas.
-- For lesions 6 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates with
the Third Eye Retroscope were 23.2% for all polyps and 24.3% for
adenomas.
-- For lesions 10 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates
with the Third Eye were 22.6% for all polyps and 19.0% for adenomas.
-- In 27 patients (9.1%), at least 1 additional polyp was found with the
Third Eye.
About Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is the official journal of the American Society
for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy publishes
original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures used in the
study, diagnosis and treatment of digestive diseases. Articles report on
outcomes research, prospective studies and controlled trials of new
endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
has become the international forum for the newest developments in the
specialty, bringing readers challenging reports from leading authorities
throughout the world.
About the Third Eye Retroscope and Avantis Medical Systems, Inc.
Avantis Medical Systems, Inc. markets the Third Eye Retroscope, an
FDA-cleared, disposable, catheter-based camera indicated for use with a
standard colonoscope to provide an additional view of the colon for
diagnostic purposes. Deployed through the instrument channel of a standard
colonoscope, the Third Eye provides the physician with a backward view to
complement the colonoscope's forward view of the lining of the colon. The
device is commercially available to physicians who perform colonoscopies.
The Third Eye is the only technology cleared by the FDA that enhances polyp
detection when used in conjunction with a colonoscope. Although
colonoscopy is the gold standard for preventing colon cancer by finding and
removing polyps and other lesions, clinical literature documents that up to
22-24% of adenomas of all sizes(3,4) and 12% of adenomas over 10 mm in
size(5) can be missed. The Third Eye has been shown in clinical studies to
help physicians find up to 25% more adenomas than a standard colonoscope
alone.
Avantis Medical is focused on delivering cost-effective solutions for
improved detection and prevention of cancers of the gastrointestinal tract.
The company has an extensive portfolio of patents covering innovative
devices based on the convergent technologies of micro-chips, enhanced video
processing and catheter-based delivery systems. For more information,
visit www.AvantisMedical.com or www.ThirdEyeRetroscope.com.
(1) Waye JD, Heigh RI, Rex DK, et al. A Retrograde-Viewing Device Improves
Detection of Adenomas in the Colon: A Prospective Efficacy Evaluation.
Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:551-6.
(2) DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, et al. Impact of Experience with a
Retrograde-Viewing Device on Adenoma Detection Rates and Withdrawal Times
during Colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope Study Group. Gastrointest
Endosc 2010;71:542-50.
(3) Rex DK, Cutler CS, Mark DG, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas
determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8.
(4) Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Dekker E, et al. Polyp Miss Rate Determined by
Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systemic Review.
Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50.
(5) Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Schindler WR, et al. Location of adenomas
missed by optical colonoscopy.
Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352-9.
Contact Information: Avantis Medical Systems Doug Gielow (408) 636-7263