Dublin, Feb. 07, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Co-development Partnering Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics 2012 to 2018" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The Global Co-development Partnering Terms and Agreements in Pharma, Biotech and Diagnostics 2012-2018 report provides comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the co-development deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading life science companies.
This report provides details of the latest Co-development agreements announced in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic sectors. Fully revised and updated, the report provides details of Co-development agreements from 2012 to 2018.
There is an increasing willingness for parties to enter co-development deals; such deals enable both parties to benefit from the upside of a big product win, whereas traditional licensing deals forfeit upside for near term upfront, milestone and royalty payments.
Co-development partnering allow the parties to securitize value and reduce risk, but keep a part of the potential upside should the product reach the market. Event if the licensor does not commercialize the project they can either sell those rights to the licensee partner or another partner for an amount higher than would have been achieved at an earlier stage licensing deal.
There are mainly two forms of co-development deals; Either the parties agree on a certain division of ownership, or decide that one party gets the rights to commercialise the drug in a certain geographical area, and the other side gets the other geographical area rights. Typically, the ownership division applies when it is likely that the project will be licensed at a later point in time. The geographical split usually applies when the two companies are determined to commercialise the drug themselves.
Another reason for co-development deals is the joint origin of a project. Drug development projects often require various scientific and technological novelties that stem from different companies. If both companies contributed to the origination of the project, then both have from the beginning a stake in the project.
Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered - contract documents provide this insight where press releases and databases do not.
This report contains a comprehensive listing of Co-development deals announced since 2012 as recorded in the Current Agreements deals and alliances database, including financial terms where available, plus links to online copies of actual Co-development contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners.
Key benefits
- In-depth understanding of co-development partnering deal trends since 2012
- Analysis of the structure of co-development agreements with numerous real life case studies
- Comprehensive listing of all co-development deals since 2012, together with deal terms, value and press release
- Comprehensive access to actual co-development contracts entered into by the world's leading life science companies
- Analysis of key deal financials including headline value, upfront, milestone payments and royalty rates
- Insight into the terms included in a co-development agreement, together with real world clause examples
- Understand the key deal terms companies have agreed in previous deals
- Undertake due diligence to assess suitability of your proposed deal terms for partner companies
Key Topics Covered:
Executive Summary
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Chapter 2 - Trends in Co-development dealmaking
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Definition of co-development deals
2.3. Success factors for co-development deals
2.4. When co-development can be useful
2.5. Attributes of co-development deals
2.6. Aligning partners to make the co-development work
2.7. Trends in Co-development deals since 2012
2.7.1. Co-development dealmaking by year, 2012 to 2018
2.7.2. Co-development dealmaking by phase of development, 2012 to 2018
2.7.3. Co-development dealmaking by industry sector, 2012 to 2018
2.7.4. Co-development dealmaking by therapy area, 2012 to 2018
2.7.5. Co-development dealmaking by technology type, 2012 to 2018
2.7.6. Co-development dealmaking by most active company, 2012 to 2018
2.8. Option to co-develop
2.9. The future of co-development deals
Chapter 3 - Overview of Co-development deal structure
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Pure versus multi-component co-development deals
3.3. Pure co-development agreement structure
3.3.1. Example co-development agreements
3.3.1.a. Case study 1: Ambrx - Zhejiang Medicine
3.3.1.b. Case study 2: UniQure - Chiesi
Chapter 4 - Leading Co-development deals
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Top Co-development deals by value
Chapter 5 - Top 50 most active Co-development dealmakers
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Top 50 most active Co-development dealmakers
Chapter 6 - Co-development deal term financials
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Co-development partnering headline values
6.3. Co-development deal upfront payments
6.4. Co-development deal milestone payments
6.5. Co-development royalty rates
Chapter 7 - Co-development deals including contracts directory
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Co-development deals with contracts 2012 to 2018
Appendices
Appendix 1 - Co-development dealmaking by companies A-Z
Appendix 2 - Co-development dealmaking by industry sector
Appendix 3 - Co-development dealmaking by stage of development
Appendix 4 - Co-development dealmaking by therapy area
Appendix 5 - Co-development dealmaking by technology
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/mhn5wg/global_pharma?w=12
Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.